SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: M.D. SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.D. SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION LLC in LAFAYETTE AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63103 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340743004.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M.D. SEBASTIAN CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- LAFAYETTE AVENUE
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63103
- Mailing
- 4825 UPPER BLACKWELL ROAD, DE SOTO, MO 63020
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: a/ At the job site, the employer did not develop, initiate, or maintain effective safety and health programs that addressed how hazard analysis, hazard control, employee hazard recognition training, or enforcement were to be performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): At the job site, frequent and regular inspections were not performed at this job site that existed for approximately five days. The following hazards were noted during this inspection, many of which existed over the five days: a/ Lack of adequate footwear. b/ Lack of protective head gear. c/ Lack of safety glasses. d/ Lack of a self-closing lid on two portable containers partially filled with gasoline. e/ Lack of conventional fall protection at unprotected, open sided edges inside of the structure. f/ Lack of conventional fall protection during leading edge work. g/ Using a portable, flexible cord not designed for hard or extra hard usage. h/ Misuse of an extension ladder. i/ Using the top step of an extension ladder for access to and egress from the second floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: At the job site, exposed employees did not receive hazard recognition training from their employer or anyone else. These employees were exposed to the following hazards: a/ Lack of adequate footwear. b/ Lack of protective head gear. c/ Lack of safety glasses. d/ Lack of a self-closing lid on two portable containers partially filled with gasoline. e/ Using a portable, flexible cord not designed for hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: At the job site, the employer did not provide exposed employee(s) with hazard recognition training in how to detect a fall hazard or the effective means of abating it. These employee(s) were exposed to the following fall hazards while framing a two-story residential home: a/ Unguarded wall opening located along the south side of the residence and measuring approximately 10'5"W X 82"H X 9' above the ground below. b/ Unguarded floor opening located along the east side of the residence on the second floor and measuring approximately 4'W X 8'L X 9' above the first floor. c/ Sheathing the second floor where four, open-sided edges existed. The fall distance to the ground below was approximately 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: At the job site, the employer did not provide exposed employee(s) with hazard recognition training in how to detect a fall hazard or the effective means of abating it with regards to portable step ladders. These employee(s) were exposed to the following fall hazards while framing a two-story residential home: a/ The exposed employees climbed down a green, portable step ladder that was positioned in the closed position. b/ The exposed employees climbed down from the second story of the residence under construction and then placed their two feet on the top rung of a second step ladder before climbing down to the first floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.96
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.96: Footwear for employees did not meet the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967: a/ At the job site, one employee was wearing standard sneakers while framing a two-story residential structure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a/ At the job site, employees framing a two-story residence were not provided with hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a/ At the job site, employees were not wearing safety glasses while operating power tools such as Bostitch Nail Guns, Dewalt Circular and Reciprocating Saws, and Ridgid Circular Saws.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.152 E05
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.152(e)(5): Dispensing devices and nozzles for flammable liquids were not of an approved type: a/ At the job site, the red, plastic, portable container partially filled with gasoline was located adjacent to the running Rolair Systems Air Compressor, unknown m/n, s/n 4090HK17-0015. The nozzle belonging to this container was not of the self-closing type. The cap belonging to this nozzle was missing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities six feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: At the job site, conventional fall protection measures were not installed during the framing of a two-story residential structure under construction. The following fall hazards were noted: a/ Unguarded wall opening located along the south side of the residence and measuring approximately 10'5"W X 82"H X 9' above the ground below. b/ Unguarded floor opening located along the east side of the residence on the second floor and measuring approximately 4'W X 8'L X 9' above the first floor. c/ Sheathing the second floor where four, open-sided edges existed. The fall distance to the ground below was approximately 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $280
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.405 A02 II J
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage: a/ At the job site, one, orange, flexible cord was used to power the job site from the temporary power pole located southwest from the residence under construction. A second, orange, flexible cord was used to power a Dewalt Circular Saw, m/n DWE575SB, s/n 162603. Neither cord was designed for hard or extra-hard usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $280 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a/ At the job site, one, green, portable step ladder was used as a means of access to or egress from the first floor of the residential structure. This ladder was used in the closed position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $280
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: a/ At the job site, the top step belonging to a portable step ladder was used by exposed employees every time they gained access to or egress from the second floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340743004.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.