Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRETE LUMBER AND FARM SUPPLY CO

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CRETE LUMBER AND FARM SUPPLY CO in 1040 E. 13TH ST, CRETE, NE 68333 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340766005.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Crete Lumber and Farm Supply CO — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Crete Lumber and Farm Supply CO is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1040 E. 13TH ST
City
CRETE
State
NE
ZIP
68333
Mailing
1600 W 12TH, CRETE, NE 68333
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):    The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards of 8' eave to ground in that; employees replacing the roof on the single story house with a 3.5 in 12 pitch did not use fall protection at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:    The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as but not limited to asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer in that; a competent person did not conduct an exposure assessment before the initiation of the removal of roofing tiles containing 15% chrysotile asbestos at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 G08 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(B): Feasible wet methods were not used to remove roofing materials that were not intact or that were rendered not intact during removal:    The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as but not limited to asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer in that; feasible wet methods were not used to suppress airborne fibers and particulate while employees were removing roofing tiles containing 15% chrysotile asbestos that did not remain fully intact at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(2)(i): The employer failed to implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) [except (d)(1)(iii)], and (f) through (m), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.1101 to use a respirator:    The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as but not limited to asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer in that; a respiratory protection program was not implemented to ensure the proper selection and use of appropriate respirators for employees removing roofing tiles that contained 15% chrysotile at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 H03 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(3)(i)(A): The employer did not select the appropriate respirators as specified in 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A):  The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as but not limited to asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer in that; filtering facepiece respirators were used instead of appropriate respiratory protection for employees removing roofing tiles that contained 15% chrysotile at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 24, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9954

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(A): Employees performing Class II work were not trained in all the elements included in 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(viii) and the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g):    The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards such as but not limited to asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer in that; at the jobsite located at 1040 E. 13th St, Crete, NE 68333 employees removing roofing tiles that contained 15% chrysotile asbestos were not trained on the specific work practices and engineering controls to implement in order to limit exposure to airborne asbestos fibers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340766005.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.