VALDOSTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: LEWIS MACHINE & ENGINEERING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEWIS MACHINE & ENGINEERING, INC. in 1816 SOUTH PATTERSON STREET, VALDOSTA, GA 31601 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340769462.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEWIS MACHINE & ENGINEERING, INC.
- Site address
- 1816 SOUTH PATTERSON STREET
- City
- VALDOSTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31601
- Mailing
- 1816 SOUTH PATTERSON STREET, VALDOSTA, GA 31601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (a) Throughout the facility, on or about July 8, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide basic advisory information contained in Appendix D to employees who used filtering facepiece respirators on a voluntary basis, resulting in a respiratory and dermal hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) In the back saw area, on or about July 8, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely by training and evaluation, resulting in a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (a) Throughout the facility, on June 8, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program for employees who used hazardous chemicals including but not limited to tapping oil, coolant, and solvents, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. (a) Throughout the facility, on June 8, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for employees who used hazardous chemicals including but not limited to tapping oil, coolant, and solvents, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Throughout the facility, on June 8, 2015 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees who used hazardous chemicals including but not limited to cutting oils, coolants, and solvents, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340769462.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.