Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT CENTRAL RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GREAT CENTRAL RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION in 7710 COMFORT AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MO 63143 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340771765.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Central Restoration & Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Central Restoration & Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7710 COMFORT AVENUE
City
MAPLEWOOD
State
MO
ZIP
63143
Mailing
1 SAINT ELIZABETH CT, O FALLON, MO 63366
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2015
Abate by
Nov 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    7710 Comfort Ave., Maplewood: Employees who were working on a residential roof approximately 10 feet 10 1/2 inches from eaves to ground level did not use any types of fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2015
Abate by
Nov 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to follow in order to minimize them:    7710 Comfort Ave., Maplewood: Employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on a roof approximately 10 feet 10 1/2 inches from eaves of the roof to ground level were not provided required training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    7710 Comfort Avenue, Maplewood: Employees who worked on a residential roof used a Louisville aluminum ladder which extended approximately 2 feet to access the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340771765.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.