Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MULLEN/TELLEZ INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MULLEN/TELLEZ INC. in 12290 ROJAS DR., EL PASO, TX 79936 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 340776400.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mullen/Tellez INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mullen/Tellez INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MULLEN/TELLEZ INC.
Site address
12290 ROJAS DR.
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79936
Mailing
905 LOMA VERDE, EL PASO, TX 79936
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees    On or about August 19, 2015, and at times prior thereto, an employee used a handcrafted vehicle support stand that was not marked with load capacity rate.  This condition exposed employees to caught between and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.244 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(2)(iii): After the load has been raised, the load was not cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once.    On or about August 19, 2015, and at times prior thereto, after an employee raise a cement mixing truck using a telescopic air service jack without securing the load immediately after the lift.  This condition exposed employees to caught between and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.244 A01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(1)(ii): Rated load(s) of portable jack(s) were not legibly and permanently marked in a prominent location on the jack(s) by casting, stamping, or other suitable means.  On or about August 19, 2015, and at times prior thereto, an employee was using a Winntec telescopic portable air jack that was not marked with the rated load capacity.  This condition exposed employees to caught between and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.244 A02 VI A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(2)(vi)(a): Each jack used constantly or intermittently at a single locality  was not thoroughly inspected at least once every six months.  On or about October 19, 2015, and at times prior thereto, employees are using jacks that were not thoroughly inspected at least every six months.  This condition exposed employees to caught between and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used for the purpose for which they were designed.    On or about August 19, 2015, and at times prior thereto, the employer's 7-foot Louisville step-ladder was not use for the purpose for which it was designed.  This condition exposed employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340776400.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.