ATLANTIC BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: M.S.C. CONTRACTING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.S.C. CONTRACTING, INC. in 1795 MAYPORT ROAD, ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340782192.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M.S.C. CONTRACTING, INC.
- Site address
- 1795 MAYPORT ROAD
- City
- ATLANTIC BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32233
- Mailing
- 8964 IVEY ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about July 13, 2015, at the roof top, employees using Hitachi nail guns were not wearing safety glasses being exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. On or about July 13, 2015, roof area, employees installing roofing shingles on a 4:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 18 feet 7 inches by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any other type of fall protection method.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a. On or about July 13, 2015, back of building, the Werner 16-foot extension ladder was only extended 12 inches past the upper level landing and was not secured to prevent accidental displacement exposing employees to a 18 feet 7 inches fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340782192.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.