Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M.S.C. CONTRACTING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.S.C. CONTRACTING, INC. in 1795 MAYPORT ROAD, ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340782192.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M.S.C. Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M.S.C. Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1795 MAYPORT ROAD
City
ATLANTIC BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32233
Mailing
8964 IVEY ROAD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32216
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. On or about July 13, 2015, at the roof top, employees using Hitachi nail guns were not wearing safety glasses being exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section:  a. On or about July 13, 2015, roof area, employees installing roofing shingles on a 4:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 18 feet 7 inches by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any other type of fall protection method.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  a. On or about July 13, 2015, back of building, the Werner 16-foot extension ladder was only extended 12 inches past the upper level landing and was not secured to prevent accidental displacement exposing employees to a 18 feet 7 inches fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340782192.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.