Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: G.P.S. MOTORS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of G.P.S. MOTORS, INC. in 1935 W. MORGAN AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53221 (NAICS 441120). OSHA activity number 340790757.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch G.P.S. Motors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for G.P.S. Motors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
G.P.S. MOTORS, INC.
Site address
1935 W. MORGAN AVENUE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53221
Mailing
1935 W. MORGAN AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53221
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441120
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    (a)     The painter was not required to wear a protective head covering or hood when painting with the isocyanate-containing primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a)     There was no written respiratory protection program implemented regarding the employee who is required to wear the half-face respirator when spraying primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a)     There was no medical determination performed regarding the employee who is required to wear the half-face respirator when spraying primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a)     There was no qualitative or quantitative respirator fit test conducted regarding the employee who is required to wear the half-face respirator when spraying primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):    (a)     There was no respiratory training conducted regarding the employee who is required to wear the half-face respirator when spraying primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)     The auto technicians use hazardous chemicals such as body filler, reducer, primer and primer activator and there had been no written hazard communication program developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:      (a)     The auto technicians use hazardous chemicals such as body filler, reducer, primer and primer activator and there was no list of hazardous chemicals developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:    (a)     The auto technicians use hazardous chemicals such as body filler, reducer, primer and primer activator and there were no safety data sheets maintained in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)     The auto technicians use hazardous chemicals such as body filler, reducer, primer and primer activator and there had been no chemical hazard training conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340790757.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.