Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APPLUS RTD

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of APPLUS RTD in 275 PROGRESS DRIVE, MANCHESTER, CT 06042 (NAICS 541990). OSHA activity number 340795384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Applus RTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Applus RTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
APPLUS RTD
Site address
275 PROGRESS DRIVE
City
MANCHESTER
State
CT
ZIP
06042
Mailing
275 PROGRESS DRIVE, MANCHESTER, CT 06042
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541990
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E09 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area were not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:  On, or about, July 23, 2015, combustible waste was not properly stored and disposed of:  a) PT Area  - Waste acetone was stored in a five gallon, plastic container and was not disposed of daily.  b) UV Area -  Acetone soaked Q-tips, used to clean parts were disposed of inside of a plastic receptacle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  Photochemical  Area - On, or about, July 23, 2015, employees required to work with corrosive photo finishing chemicals were not required to wear protective chemical aprons when working with the following concentrates:  a)  AGFA, G335, Part B, a photographic fixing concentrate, which has a pH of 2.1. b)  AFGA, 135, Part A, photographic developer concentrate, which has a pH of 11.9.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  Photochemical  Area - On, or about, July 23, 2015, the employer did not verify through a written certification that a hazard assessment had been performed. Employees required to work with the following  chemicals were not provided appropriate personal protective equipment:   a)  AGFA, G335, Part B, a photographic fixing concentrate, which has a pH of 2.1. b)  AFGA, 135, Part A, photographic developer concentrate, which has a pH of 11.9.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  Photochemical  Area - On, or about, July 23, 2015, employees required to work with corrosive photo finishing chemicals were not required to wear appropriate eye protection,, such as, but not limited to, chemical goggles and face protection, such as, but not limited to, face shields. Employees used the following chemicals:  a)  AGFA, G335, Part B, a photographic fixing concentrate, which has a pH of 2.1. b)  AFGA, 135, Part A, photographic developer concentrate, which has a pH of 11.9.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  Facility - On, or about, July 23, 2015, the employer did not request that the manufacturer of a Daewoo, G30E, propane powered forklift truck provide plates to identify the attachment, approximate weight of truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered when a front end boom attachment manufactured by the Caldwell Group was used on the forklift truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Facility - On, or about, July 23, 2015, the employer did not evaluate each industrial truck operator's performance at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.184 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): Sling(s) that were damaged or defective were used:  Facility - On, or about, July 23, 2015, a Stren-Flex nylons sling, which showed physical damaged, that included, but was not limited to, tears and snags were used to move large metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2380
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.184 C07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(7): Sling(s) were not padded or protected from sharp edges of their loads:   Facility - On, or about, July 23, 2015, a Stren-Flex nylon sling, which showed physical damage such as tears,  was not padded or protected from the sharp edges of the loads of jagged metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not being inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer:   Facility - On, or about, July 23, 2015, a Stren-Flex nylon sling, which showed physical damaged, that included, but was not limited to, tears and snags was not inspected by a competent person each day prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:   Photochemical  Area - On, or about, July 23, 2015, the following containers were not marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  a)  A 50 gallon container of dilute AGFA, G335, Part B, a photographic fixing concentrate, that contained aluminum sulfate, which is a skin irritant.  b)  A 50 gallon container of dilute AFGA, 135, Part A, photographic developer concentrate, that contained hydroquinone, which is a carcinogen.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340795384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.