SILVER LAKE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: OTONIEL HIDALGO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OTONIEL HIDALGO in 1000 LOTUS DR., SILVER LAKE, WI 53170 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340796531.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OTONIEL HIDALGO
- Site address
- 1000 LOTUS DR.
- City
- SILVER LAKE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53170
- Mailing
- 2111 HERMON AVE., ZION, IL 60099
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Employees conducting roofing activities on a roof with a 6:12 pitch were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 13.7 feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately removed from service: (a) An extension ladder with a defective rung was being used for access to the roof of a commercial roofing project.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340796531.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.