Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STERIGENICS INTERNATIONAL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STERIGENICS INTERNATIONAL in 84 PARK ROAD, QUEENSBURY, NY 12804 (NAICS 561710). OSHA activity number 340797505.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sterigenics International — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sterigenics International is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
84 PARK ROAD
City
QUEENSBURY
State
NY
ZIP
12804
Mailing
84 PARK ROAD, QUEENSBURY, NY 12804
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561710
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
May 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include relief system design and design basis:    (a)  Chamber room, EO sterilization chamber 1:   On or prior to 7/22/15, the employer could and did not document the design and design basis for pressure relief valve PSV 301, Kunkle model 912BJHM01KE, since this valve has insufficient relief capacity to protect chamber 1 from nitrogen overpressure.     One acceptable and feasible means of abatement would be to provide and document a relief valve installation having sufficient capacity to protect chamber 1, such as, but not limited to, that specified by NFPA 55  2010, Section 14.8.3.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
May 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information on paragraph (d) of this section) before use:      (a)  Chamber room, EO sterilization chamber 1:  On or prior to 7/22/15, the employer did not correct deficient valve PSV 301, Kunkle model 912BJHM01KE, to ensure that adequate relief capacity was provided to protect chamber 1 and employees against the hazards of nitrogen overpressure, including but not limited to chamber rupture, and ethylene oxide release toxic and explosion hazards.      One acceptable and feasible means of abatement would be to provide and document a relief valve installation having sufficient capacity to protect chamber 1, such as, but not limited to, that specified by NFPA 55  2010, Section 14.8.3.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    (a)  Chamber room, to the west of and in front of boiler room, chambers 4, 8, and 3:  On or prior to 7/22/15, the employer did not document that exterior wall(s) or roof were provided with explosion vents or similar protection such as, but not limited to, those specified by NFPA 560, section 11.3.1.3.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 D03 III

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(iii): For existing equipment designed and constructed in accordance with codes, standards, or practices no longer in general use, the employer did not determine and document that the equipment in the process was designed, maintained, inspected, tested, and operating in a safe manner.    (a)  Gas room, west side of plant:   On or prior to 7/22/15, the employer did not document that covered process equipment was safe to operate, as both the process equipment and employees are exposed to the hazard of explosion, including but not limited to structural collapse.    Abatement note:   One acceptable and feasible means of abatement would be to provide and document the installation of explosion vents as specified in NFPA 55  2010, Section 14.11.2.1.1     (b)  Chamber room, to the west of and in front of boiler room, chambers 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9:  On or prior to 7/22/15, the employer did not document that covered process equipment was safe to operate, as both the process equipment and employees are exposed to the hazard of explosion, including but not limited to structural collapse.    Abatement note:   One acceptable and feasible means of abatement would be to provide and document the installation of explosion vents as specified in NFPA 55  2010, Section 14.11.2.1.1
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The Process Hazard Analysis did not address the hazards of the process:    (a)   2013 and prior PHA, EO Sterilization process:  On or prior to 7/22/15, the PHA did not address explosion relief hazard(s) associated with lack of explosion vent panel(s) in the west gas room     (b)  2013 and prior PHA, EO Sterilization process:  On or prior to 7/22/15, the PHA did not address explosion relief hazard(s) associated with lack of explosion vent panel(s) behind sterilization chambers 1 through 9.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E05

Other-than-serious 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
Nov 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not assure that PHA recommendations were resolved in a timely manner:    (a) 2013 PHA -- On or about 7/22/15, PHA recommendation 2 -- 2.1.11.1,   "Evaluate drum and EO line grounding system" with date to be completed by indicated as August 2014, was still in open status.    (b) 2013 PHA -- On or about 7/22/15, PHA recommendation 4  7.1.1.1,  "Determine if flanged connection of vacuum header can be located outside of boiler room" with date to be completed by indicated as May 2014, was still in open status.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
May 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:      (a) Chamber room, north wall, behind chambers B, C, D, E:  On or prior to 7/22/15, written procedures were not established to maintain the onging integrity of CS Explovent explosion relief vent panels.    (b) Gas storage room 2, east wall:  On or prior to 7/22/15, written procedures were not established to maintain the onging integrity of CS Explovent explosion relief vent panels.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2016
Abate by
May 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer did not perform inspection and tests on process equipment    (a) Chamber room, north wall, behind chambers B, C, D, E:  On or prior to 7/22/15, CS Explovent explosion relief vent panels were not inspected and tested for proper operation.    (b) Gas storage room 2, east wall:  On or prior to 7/22/15, CS Explovent explosion relief vent panels were not inspected and tested for proper operation.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Sterigenics International's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340797505.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.