SILVER LAKE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: FABER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FABER CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 408 E. PROSSER ST., SILVER LAKE, WI 53170 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340798057.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FABER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 408 E. PROSSER ST.
- City
- SILVER LAKE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53170
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 166, SILVER LAKE, WI 53170
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer did not develop and implement safety and/or health programs, which included frequent and regular inspection to ensure employees are protected from recognized hazards. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not provide employees with training on fall protection by a competent person, which included hazard recognition and procedures to ensure employee safety when working at heights. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B04
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, which was not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches: (a) The employer did not ensure that the scaffold planks, supported by step ladders, extended a minimum of 6 inches pass the support. This exposed employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure employees were utilizing fall protection while conducting re-roofing work on a residential building. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees utilized a ladder(s) when accessing and egressing from the roof, where there was a break in elevation of approximately 36 inches. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340798057.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.