Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANIMAL NUTRITION SYSTEMS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANIMAL NUTRITION SYSTEMS in 6801 SUNDUST, CHANDLER, AZ 85226 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 340806678.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Animal Nutrition Systems — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Animal Nutrition Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6801 SUNDUST
City
CHANDLER
State
AZ
ZIP
85226
Mailing
571 N. 54TH STREET, CHANDLER, AZ 85226
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311119
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employees or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures:    Plant - The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented for those employees required to wear respiratory protection, including Moldex N-95 respirators.    The respiratory protection program shall include, at a minimum, procedures for selecting respirators; medical evaluations; fit testing; procedures for proper use in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; procedures for cleaning, storing, inspecting, repairing and discarding respirators; employee training regarding respiratory hazards they are exposed to, proper uses and limitations of respirators; and procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the respirator program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     Plant - The employer supplied employees with Moldex N-95 respirators and they are worn as a condition of work when mixing supplemental dairy cow feed.  The employer did not ensure that the employee was medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.       Plant - The employer did not ensure that employees donning Moldex N-95 respirators received annual fit testing as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K05

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually:   Plant - The employer did not provide annual training to employees wearing Moldex N-95 respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that very flight of stairs having 4 or more risers was equipped with standard stair railings or standard handrails.   Plant  - The stairs leading to the second level break room did not have a standard railing running the full length of the stairs on the left side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     Plant - Employees have been provided personal protective equipment such as gloves, safety glasses and respirators to protect them against work place hazards.  A hazard assessment has not been performed to include the following elements:          1.  Select and have each affected employee use the types of PPE that will protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment;  2.  Communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee and;  3.  Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.          *ABATEMENT NOTE: The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Abate by
Oct 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance shall be conducted at least once every three years.     Plant - The employer did not provide a fork lift driver with forklift refresher training at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):        Plant - Two fork lifts were defective in the following ways:   a. Nissan Optima 30 fork lift  - The  brake lights did not illuminate when the brake pedal was depressed.  b. Nissan 50 fork lift - The  brake lights did not illuminate when the brake pedal was depressed and the horn did not sound.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:        Plant - The employer failed to train exposed employees on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new SDS formation by December 2, 2013, as required by the revised Hazard Communication Standard.  Employees handle and use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, zinc, magnesium, and copper powders as well as other feed additives.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Animal Nutrition Systems's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340806678.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.