Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ULTIMATE SHADE ALTERNATIVES INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ULTIMATE SHADE ALTERNATIVES INC. in 7007 W. SUNDUST RD., CHANDLER, AZ 85226 (NAICS 314999). OSHA activity number 340806710.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ultimate Shade Alternatives INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ultimate Shade Alternatives INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7007 W. SUNDUST RD.
City
CHANDLER
State
AZ
ZIP
85226
Mailing
7007 W. SUNDUST RD., CHANDLER, AZ 85226
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
314999
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes must be free and unobstructed. No materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route. The exit access must not go through a room that can be locked, such as a bathroom, to reach an exit or exit discharge, nor may it lead into a dead-end corridor. Stairs or a ramp must be provided where the exit route is not substantially level.      Sewing Room -- Upon opening the rear exit door, it was noted that exit discharge was not maintained.   There was a measured 32" drop to ground level.  Stairs or a ramp is needed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Anchoring fixed machinery.  Machines designed for a fixed location shall be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.     Maintenance Shop - A Ryobi 6" bench grinder was not secured to the work bench.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:     Sewing Room - A Ryobi double wheeled bench grinder (MD. # BGH6110) was missing work rests on both the left and right side abrasive wheels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $100
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:       Sewing Room - A Ryobi double wheeled  bench grinder (MD. # BGH6110) was missing tongue guards on both the left and right side abrasive wheels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or other means listed under this provision:     Fabrication Store Room - An electrical panel board (3-phase, 110-220) was missing the face plate thereby exposing employees to live conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     Workplace - Employees have been provided personal protective equipment such as gloves and safety shoes, welding helmets and aprons, and safety glasses and hard hats to protect them against hazards both in the work place and in the field.  A hazard assessment has not been performed to include the following elements:          1.  Select and have each affected employee use the types of PPE that will protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment;  2.  Communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee and;  3.  Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.          *ABATEMENT NOTE: The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:     Welding/outdoor Shop - A maintenance check had not been performed annually on a portable fire extinguisher where welding is performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:        Workplace - The employer failed to train exposed employees on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new SDS formation by December 2, 2013, as required by the revised Hazard Communication Standard.  Employees handle and use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone, welding gases (Oxygen, Acetylene, Argon), and fuels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340806710.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.