SOMERS POINT, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: GOLDEN HEART ADULT MEDICAL DAY CARE INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GOLDEN HEART ADULT MEDICAL DAY CARE INC in 101 SHORE RD, SOMERS POINT, NJ 08244 (NAICS 624120). OSHA activity number 340812015.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GOLDEN HEART ADULT MEDICAL DAY CARE INC
- Site address
- 101 SHORE RD
- City
- SOMERS POINT
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08244
- Mailing
- 101 SHORE RD, SOMERS POINT, NJ 08244
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 624120
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Kitchen: The employer did not provide and ensure the use of goggles where employees used Ecolab Proforce Sanitizer, a corrosive chemical, for cleaning dishes and counter surfaces, on or about 7/30/15. b) Throughout facility: The employer did not provide and ensure the use of goggles where employees used bleach, a corrosive chemical, for cleaning floor and tables, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) Kitchen: An eyewash station, capable of 15 minutes of continuous flushing, was not provided where employees used Ecolab Proforce Sanitizer and bleach, corrosive chemicals, for cleaning, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) Throughout facility: The employer did not develop and implement a written exposure control plan for those employees who had potential exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials, including, but not limited to, registered nurses, certified home health aides, nursing assistants, administrative medical assistants and drivers, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: a) Exam room/screening room: The employer failed to use engineering controls that would eliminate or minimize exposures, such as retractable finger prick lancets, among other controls, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 F01 II A
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that medical evaluations and procedures including the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series, post-exposure evaluation, or follow-up, including prophylaxis, were made available at no cost to the employee: a) Throughout facility: The employer did not ensure that a post-exposure evaluation for an employee who was stuck by a contaminated lancet needle was provided at no cost to the employee, on or about 6/18/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure: Note: Does not apply to employees who have previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, for whom antibody testing has indicated immunity, or for whom the vaccine is contraindicated for medical reasons. a) Throughout facility: The hepatitis B vaccination was not made available to all employees who had occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F03 II A
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(A): The post-exposure evaluation and follow-up of an exposure incident did not include testing the source individual's blood as soon as feasible and after consent was obtained in order to determine HBV and HIV infectivity: a) Throughout facility: The employer did not test a source individual's blood or attempt to receive consent from the source individual after an employee was stuck by a contaminated needle, on or about 6/18/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a) Throughout facility: The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for the chemicals used in the facility by employees, including, but not limited to, bleach and Ecolab Proforce Sanitizer, corrosive chemicals, and Lysol Disinfectant wipes, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Throughout facility: The employer did not provide training for the chemicals used in the facility by employees, including, but not limited to, bleach and Ecolab Proforce Sanitizer, corrosive chemicals, and Lysol Disinfectant wipes, on or about 7/30/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: a) Throughout facility: On or about 7/30/15 the employer did not record the following workplace injury or illness on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2015: a) Exam room/screening room: On 6/18/15 an employee was stuck by a contaminated lancet needle. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $200
- — Z (O) $400
1910.1030 H05 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i): The employer did not establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps: a) Throughout facility: An employee was stuck by a contaminated lancet needle. The employer did not maintain a sharps injury log to record percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps, on or about 6/18/15. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Golden Heart Adult Medical DAY Care INC
View Golden Heart Adult Medical DAY Care INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 624120)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340812015.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.