Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FANIA ROOFING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FANIA ROOFING COMPANY in 305 MADISON AVE, MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340813054.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fania Roofing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fania Roofing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
305 MADISON AVE
City
MORRISTOWN
State
NJ
ZIP
07960
Mailing
271 E BLACKWELL ST, DOVER, NJ 07802
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

17 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1060 A01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120
1926.1060(a)(1)(iii)): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a)  Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     An employee climbed onto a gravel hopper at the edge of a 4th story roof structure  and was standing near the edge of the hopper approximately 23 feet above the lower level to the 3rd story roof top surface below.  This employee was approximately 3 feet from this edge when he climbed onto the hopper.      Violation occurred 7-23-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:     a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     An employee performing roofing work  stepped onto the top step and top of an A Frame 8 foot stepladder to access a gravel hopper with a fall of 8 feet to the roof surface below and approximately 23 feet to the lower level.     Violation occurred on or about July 23, 2015          (a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i): When no mechanical equipment was being used the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8m) from the roof edge:    Employees were performing roofing operations on a flat roof of the 4th story roof surface  with a fall of 15 feet to the lower level.  The employer stated that the employees were protected by a warning line system.  However, on the East side near where the gravel hopper was being used, the warning line was approximately 4 feet from the edge.  Also, on the South side of the roof edge, the warning line was also 4 feet from the edge.      Violation occurred 7-23-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 F02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface.  a)  Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees were performing roofing operations on a flat roof of the 4th story roof surface  with a fall of 15 feet to the lower level.  The employer stated that the employees were protected by a warning line system.  However, on the East side edge the warning line was approximately 24 inches in height, on the South side the warning line was approximately 26 inches in height, and on the West side the warning line was approximately 18 inches in height.     Violation occurred 7-23-15
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas:    a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees removed Class II built up roofing materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The work was not conducted within a regulated area.     Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 J02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(2)(i): The employer did not establish a decontamination room or area for employees and equipment, adjacent to the regulated area, consisting of an impermeable drop cloth on the floor or horizontal working surface, for employees engaged in Class I work involving less than 25 linear or 10 square feet of thermal system insulation or surfacing asbestos containing material and for Class II and Class III asbestos work operations where exposures exceed a permissible exposure limit or where there was not negative exposure assessment produced before the operation:   a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees removed Class II built up roofing materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.    The employer failed to perform an exposure assessment of the work, and failed to establish a decontamination room for employees engaged in Class II asbestos work.   Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7)(i): Warning signs that demarcated the regulated area were not provided and displayed at such a distance from regulated areas that an employee may read the signs an take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs:    a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees removed Class II  built up roofing materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The work was not conducted within a regulated area demarcated by warning signs to warn employees to take necessary protective steps.   Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace:      a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees removed Class II  built up roofing materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The employer did not ensure that a competent person conduct an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during the roof removal.       Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 G08 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(D): When built-up roofing with asbestos-containing roofing felts and an aggregate surface were removed using a power roof cutter, the dust resulting from the cutting operation was not collected by a HEPA dust collector or was not vacuumed along the cut line:      a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees removed Class II  built up roofing materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The employer did not provide vacuums equipped with HEPA filters to collect all debris and dust containing Asbestos Containing Material.       Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 L02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(2): Asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal was not collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers:  a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees removed Class II  built up roof materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The class II material was not collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers.   Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 H03 III A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(3)(iii)(A): The employer did not provide a half-mask air-purifying respirator, other than a disposable respirator, equipped with high-efficiency filters, whenever the employee(s) performed Class II and III asbestos jobs where no negative exposure assessment was available:   a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees removed Class II  built up roof materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The employer only provided N-95 half face air purifying respirators, not elastomeric half mask negative pressure air purifying respirators with P-100 HEPA cartridges, for employees performing the Asbestos Containing built up roofing material.   Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1101 K03 II B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii)(B): The employer did not inform employees who performed work under 29 CFR 1926.1101 of the location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material present in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area:  a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ   Employees removed Class II  built up roof materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The employer did not inform employees who performed the ACM removal of the location and quantity of ACM in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area.   Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,120

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(A): Employees performing Class II work were not trained in all the elements included in 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(viii) and the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g):    a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees removed Class II  built up roof materials that contained up to 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.  The employer did not provide the employees with any information about the asbestos containing built up roofing  disturbed and handled, nor precautions they should take to minimize exposure to airborne asbestos fibers, or any of the elements required by 1926.1101(k)(9)(viii).     Violation occurred on or about July 15 to July 17, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1428 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Abate by
Jan 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1428(a)(3): 29 CFR 1926.1428(a)(3): The employer did not make the documentation for whichever option is used available at the site while the signal person is employed by the employer.  The documentation did not specify each type of signaling (e.g. hand signals, radio signals, etc.) for which the signal person meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.    a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees were distributing gravel hoisted to the 4th story roof surface with a Liebherr LTM-1090 110 Ton crane.  The operator estimated the heaviest load was approximately 3000 to 4000 lbs.  The foreman acting as signalman using hand and radio signals said that he was aware of crane signals, however did not have formal training in crane signals and there was no documentation of his  hand or radio signaling training on the site.    Violation occurred on or about July 23, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Abate by
Jan 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees performing new roof system installation used chemicals including but not limited to flammable liquids Klean Strip Acetone that causes CNS depressant effects and is a skin and eye irritant, and Firestone Single Ply LVOC Bonding Adhesive,that contains Parachlorobenzotrifluoride that is a hepatotoxin and causes eye and skin burns.  The employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for the employees exposed to these chemicals.        Violation occurred on or about July 23, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees performing new roof system installation used chemicals including but not limited to flammable liquids Klean Strip Acetone that causes CNS depressant effects and is a skin and eye irritant, and Firestone Single Ply LVOC Bonding Adhesive,that contains Parachlorobenzotrifluoride that is a hepatotoxin and causes eye and skin burns.  The employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for the employees exposed to these chemicals.        Violation occurred on or about July 23, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2015
Abate by
Jan 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a)   Worksite, 305 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ     Employees performing new roof system installation used chemicals including but not limited to flammable liquids Klean Strip Acetone that causes CNS depressant effects and is a skin and eye irritant, and Firestone Single Ply LVOC Bonding Adhesive,that contains Parachlorobenzotrifluoride that is a hepatotoxin and causes eye and skin burns.  The employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for the employees exposed to these chemicals.        Violation occurred on or about July 23, 2015
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Fania Roofing Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340813054.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.