Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WALLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of WALLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION in 40 WALLACE LANE, DANBURY, NH 03230 (NAICS 321992). OSHA activity number 340813831.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wallace Building Products Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wallace Building Products Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
40 WALLACE LANE
City
DANBURY
State
NH
ZIP
03230
Mailing
40 WALLACE LANE, DANBURY, NH 03230
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321992
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2015
Abate by
Sep 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:    a. Site- Employees were not protected from crushing and struck by hazards where the employer failed to obtain JLG Industries Inc. permission to use homemade 12 foot fork extensions with their Lull 944E-42 rough terrain forklift. The fork extensions were found in operation with a bow of 1 1/4 inches near the back third of the fork extensions due to overloading and or tip loading.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2015
Abate by
Sep 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a. Site- The employer failed to provide powered industrial truck operator training for operators who showed evidence of training from a past employer. The employer failed to ensure that the previous training was complete including a performance evaluation and that the employees were trained to operate same JLG all terrain forklifts and Nissan forklift which are operated at the site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2015
Abate by
Nov 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a. Site- Employees operating the extruder are not protected from laceration, crushing, and amputation hazards where the hold downs and dogs cycle into place after being tripped and are not guarded from contact. On or about 5/19/2015 an employee operating the extruder had the tip of their left ring finger caught between a hold down on the extruder and the wood framing being assembled by the extruder, removing a part of the finger tip.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.179 J03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2015
Abate by
Oct 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:  a. Site- The employer failed to complete a periodic inspection of the overhead crane at the site within 12 months of the previous inspection, which took place on June 3, 2014
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Wallace Building Products Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340813831.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.