CHANDLER, AZ —
OSHA Inspection: BLUE RHINO PROPANE
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BLUE RHINO PROPANE in 6672 W. SUNDUST, CHANDLER, AZ 85226 (NAICS 424710). OSHA activity number 340815463.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BLUE RHINO PROPANE
- Site address
- 6672 W. SUNDUST
- City
- CHANDLER
- State
- AZ
- ZIP
- 85226
- Mailing
- 6672 W. SUNDUST, CHANDLER, AZ 85226
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424710
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): Transportation/yard - Employees have been provided personal protective equipment such as gloves and safety shoes to protect them against hazards such as sharp edges on propane tank or foot injuries if a tanks falls during loading or unloading operations. A hazard assessment has not been performed to include the following elements: 1. Select and have each affected employee use the types of PPE that will protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; 2. Communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee and; 3. Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. *ABATEMENT NOTE: The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: Transportation/yard - The employer failed to train exposed employees on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new SDS formation by December 2, 2013, as required by the revised Hazard Communication Standard. Employees handle and transport propane gas.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424710)
More inspections in AZ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340815463.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.