Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BLG LOGISTICS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BLG LOGISTICS, INC. in 10095 BROSE DRIVE, STE 300, VANCE, AL 35490 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340820182.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BLG Logistics, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BLG Logistics, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BLG LOGISTICS, INC.
Site address
10095 BROSE DRIVE, STE 300
City
VANCE
State
AL
ZIP
35490
Mailing
10077 BROSE DRIVE, STE 100, VANCE, AL 35490
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
54
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,100 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Loading docks, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 48.5 inches, in that guardrails (or equivalent) were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $5100

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not provided and used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:     a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Warehouse, the employer did not provide eye protection for employee exposed to chemical hazards such as, but not limited to, battery acid when adding water to the forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Warehouse, the employer did not provide hand protection for employee exposed to chemical hazards such as, but not limited to, battery acid when adding water to the forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Warehouse, a hazard assessment was not conducted of tasks such as, but not limited to, adding water to forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Warehouse, suitable facilities were not available to employees exposed to corrosive material such as, but not limited to, battery acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.178 M07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,100 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(7): Brakes were not set and/or wheel blocks were not in place to prevent movement of trucks, trailers, or railroad cars while loading and unloading:    a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Warehouse, wheel blocks were not used when a forklift was used to load a trailer located at Bay ZS 8.3.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $5100

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:    a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDS) for hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to Lead Acid Battery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer:  a) On or about May 20, 2015 - Facility, employees, working in and around chemicals such as, but not limited to Lead Acid batteries, were not provided effective training or explanation of labels and other forms of warning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 54 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2015
Abate by
Oct 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  a) On or about July 30, 2015 - Facility, a designated exit door was not marked with a sign.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BLG Logistics, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340820182.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.