CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: OUR LADY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT CENTER
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OUR LADY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT CENTER in 5418 MOELLER AVE., CINCINNATI, OH 45212 (NAICS 813110). OSHA activity number 340831486.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OUR LADY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT CENTER
- Site address
- 5418 MOELLER AVE.
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45212
- Mailing
- 5418 MOELLER AVE., CINCINNATI, OH 45212
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 813110
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1101 E01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas: a) Starting on or about the third week of July 2015 thermal system insulation was removed from the basement of the Pope house and was not conducted within a regulated area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1101 E06
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(6): The employer did not ensure that all asbestos work performed within regulated areas was supervised by a competent person: a) Starting on or about the third week of July 2015 thermal system insulation was removed from the basement of the Pope house and was not supervised by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1101 F01 I
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed: a) Starting on or about the third week of July 2015 thermal system insulation was removed from the basement of the Pope house and no exposure monitoring was performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1101 F02 I
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace: a) Starting on or about the third week of July 2015 thermal system insulation was removed from the basement of the Pope house and no exposure assessment was performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1101 K09 I
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not ensure participation in the asbestos training program by each employee who was likely to be exposed to asbestos in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), or for each employee engaged in Class I through Class IV asbestos operations: a) Starting on or about the third week of July 2015 thermal system insulation (Class 1 work) was removed from the basement of the Pope house and the employer did not ensure that employees had participated in a training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) A hazard communication program had not been developed or implemented for employees exposed to chemicals and substances, such as but not limited to, asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Employees working with and exposed to chemicals and substances, such as but not limited to, asbestos, paints and gasoline, had not been trained on the physical and health hazards prior to working with them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at OUR Lady of the Holy Spirit Center
View OUR Lady of the Holy Spirit Center's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 813110)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340831486.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.