MEREDITH, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: KEITH LAMANUZZI
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KEITH LAMANUZZI in 208 DANIEL WEBSTER HWY, MEREDITH, NH 03253 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340837434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEITH LAMANUZZI
- Site address
- 208 DANIEL WEBSTER HWY
- City
- MEREDITH
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03253
- Mailing
- 20 SHEDD RD., NORTHFIELD, NH 03276
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets: a. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, hardhats were not utilized by employees exposed to head injuries from falling materials above them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in accordance with paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section: a. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, fall protection was not utilized by employees working from the ladder scaffolding and exposed to falls of over 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, fall protection was not utilized by employees engaged in roofing work and exposed to falls of over 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): The side rails of portable ladders used for access did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, or was secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect and along with a grasping devise to assist employees mounting and dismounting the ladder: Instance a. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, the red fiberglass extension ladder in use to access the roof area did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing and working surface. Instance b. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, the 20 foot aluminum ladder in use to access the roof area did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing and working surface. Instance c. Site - On or about August 7, 2015, the aluminum ladder in use to access the ladder scaffolding system did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing and working surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340837434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.