WOOD RIDGE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: RAMOS BROS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAMOS BROS in 162 14TH STREET, WOOD RIDGE, NJ 07075 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340840974.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAMOS BROS
- Site address
- 162 14TH STREET
- City
- WOOD RIDGE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07075
- Mailing
- 2300 SOUTH BROAD STREET APT M-10, HAMILTON, NJ 08610
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,160 · Current $864 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Exterior, Roof of house: Employees were exposed to eye/face injuries while using pneumatic nail guns and were not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about July 16th, 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $864
- — Z (S) $2160
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,008 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) A) Roof of structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet while engaged in roofing replacement on a residential structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about July 16th, 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1008
- — Z (S) $2520
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340840974.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.