Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A.D.A. FRAMING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A.D.A. FRAMING in 11211 N 148TH EAST AVE, OWASSO, OK 74055 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340844380.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A.D.A. Framing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A.D.A. Framing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A.D.A. FRAMING
Site address
11211 N 148TH EAST AVE
City
OWASSO
State
OK
ZIP
74055
Mailing
1712 11TH STREET, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:    On or about August 12, 2015, employees used a circular saw that had a worn and frayed electrical cord.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    On or abut August 12, 2015, employee worked from a scaffold that was not designed by a qualified person, therefore, the scaffold design lacked the required capacity ratings, safety factors and stability assurance. Employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  On or about August 12, 2015, employee worked from a job made scaffold that did not have a platform at least 18 inches wide.  Employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.     On or about August 12, 2015, the employer had not ensured each employee who worked while on a scaffold was trained by a person qualified to recognize the hazards associated with scaffolds and to understand the procedures to control or minimize the hazards.  Employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2016
Abate by
Jan 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about August 12, 2015, an employee working at a height greater than 6 feet above lower/ground level was not provided fall protection.  Employee was exposed to the hazard of falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340844380.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.