Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BAYLAND BUILDINGS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BAYLAND BUILDINGS, INC. in 2800 N. MAIN STREET, OSHKOSH, WI 54901 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 340844687.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bayland Buildings, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bayland Buildings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2800 N. MAIN STREET
City
OSHKOSH
State
WI
ZIP
54901
Mailing
P.O. BOX 13571, GREEN BAY, WI 54307
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332311
Employees
27
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer had painters wearing 1/2 mask respirators and had not developed a respirator program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer had employees working as painters that were wearing 1/2 mask respirators and had not been provided with medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer had painters wearing 1/2 mask respirators that had not been fit tested before use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:   a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer had painters storing respirators in the open hanging from hooks on a work bench.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:    a)    On or about 8/13/2015, employer was permitting employees to operate lift trucks that had not received the required training per the OSHA standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2015
Abate by
Sep 4, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a)    On or about 8/13/2015, the employer did not have a copy of the safety data sheet for STEEL SPEC Fast Dry Universal Metal Primer, Gray.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Bayland Buildings, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340844687.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.