Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAVID MAYA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID MAYA in 2931 & 2936 SENDERO, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75054 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340852441.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch David Maya — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Maya is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVID MAYA
Site address
2931 & 2936 SENDERO
City
GRAND PRAIRIE
State
TX
ZIP
75054
Mailing
3612 CARMEL MOUNTAIN DRIVE, MC KINNEY, TX 75070
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails, and all other debris, shall be kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  a) Employer did not ensure and employees kept work areas clear of protruding nails, below employee work area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and walkway was not at least 18 inches wide:  a) Employer did not ensure employee working on scaffold platform was at least 18 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers:  a) Employer did not ensure when employees are working more than 10 feet on a scaffold are protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.452 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(4): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire outside face of all double- and single-pole scaffolds:  a) Employer did not ensure employees installed diagonal bracing in both directions across the entire outside face of scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

View David Maya's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340852441.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.