BRAINTREE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ABL HOME IMPROVEMENT INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ABL HOME IMPROVEMENT INC. in 452 ELM STREET, BRAINTREE, MA 02184 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340855360.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABL HOME IMPROVEMENT INC.
- Site address
- 452 ELM STREET
- City
- BRAINTREE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02184
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 514, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for Citation 1, Items 1-5 within 10 calendar days of the abatement date, nor did they respond to the letter requesting abatement, received on March 10, 2016
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards from flying debris, while using nail gun, and were not protected by safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous Employees were exposed to electric shock while using an extension cord, which was missing a grounding pin.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet, while working on an 6 pitch roof, where fall protection had not been used or provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximate height of 13 feet, while performing roofing work. Employees received no fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using an metal extension ladder, that was not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340855360.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.