Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: C & C METALS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of C & C METALS, INC. in 1402 E DAVIS ST, CONROE, TX 77301 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 340858059.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch C & C Metals, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for C & C Metals, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
C & C METALS, INC.
Site address
1402 E DAVIS ST
City
CONROE
State
TX
ZIP
77301
Mailing
1402 E DAVIS ST, CONROE, TX 77301
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    The employer has not established and implemented a written respiratory program when employees are required to wear respiratory protection. This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, in the painting area when employees were required to wear 3M half face tight fitting respirators while painting without having an established written respiratory protection program.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that they establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that includes the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i-ix).
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1750
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    The employer does not ensure that employees that are required to wear respirators are medically evaluated to prevent employee injury. This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the painting area were exposed to respiration hazards while wearing 3M half face tight fitting respirators without having been medically evaluated.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees that are required to wear respirators are medically evaluated before being fit tested or wearing them in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.     The employer does not ensure that employees required to wear tight fitting respirators are fit tested. This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, in the painting area when employees were required to wear 3M half face tight fitting respirators while painting without having been fit tested.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all employees required to wear tight fitting respirators are fit tested.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.    The employer does not ensure that respirators worn by employees are stored so they are not damaged or contaminated. This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the painting area were exposed to respiration hazards while using 3M tight fitting respirators without storing them in a manner that would prevent them from being damaged or contaminated.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all respirators used by employees are stored so they are protected from deformation, damage and contamination.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.     The employer does not ensure that each operator successfully completes training consisting of a combination of formal instruction and practical training.  This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to operate forklifts without successfully completing formal and practical operator training.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each operator successfully completes the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), and practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $2450
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 A02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(ii): Suitable extinguishing equipment was not maintained in a state of readiness for instant use.     The employer does not ensure that suitable fire extinguishing equipment are maintained in a state of readiness for instant use during welding operations.  This violation was observed on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, inside of shop area, where employees were exposed to fire hazards while welding without having suitable fire extinguishing equipment in a state of readiness for instant use during welding operations         Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that suitable fire extinguishing equipment are maintained in a state of readiness for instant use during welding operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1960
  • — C (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least.    The employer does not ensure that oxygen cylinders were separated from acetylene cylinders with at least a 5 foot barrier with a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour.  This violation was observed on or about August 18, 2015, and at times prior thereto, inside of shop area, where employees were exposed to fire hazards where oxygen cylinders were stored with acetylene cylinders without a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet high with a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour.        Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that Oxygen cylinders in storage are separated from fuel-gas cylinders a minimum distance of 20 feet or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $1400
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).    The employer does not maintain and make readily accessible copies of safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace. This violation occurred on or about August 18, 2015, at the shop, where employees were using chemicals such as, but not limited to, thinner, paint, Devflex PF, and coatings without maintaining safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals at the worksite.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that safety data sheets are maintained and made available to employees on all work shifts for all hazardous chemicals in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View C & C Metals, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340858059.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.