OLD SAYBROOK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MAX CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAX CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 40 ELM STREET, OLD SAYBROOK, CT 06475 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340867340.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAX CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 40 ELM STREET
- City
- OLD SAYBROOK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06475
- Mailing
- 355 PEARL LAKE ROAD, WATERBURY, CT 06706
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: Jobsite: The employees who were engaged in building a new single family residence were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at MAX Construction, LLC
View MAX Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340867340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.