FARMINGDALE, ME —
OSHA Inspection: 3D HOME IMPROVEMENT
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of 3D HOME IMPROVEMENT in 535 MAINE AVENUE, FARMINGDALE, ME 04344 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340867910.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 3D HOME IMPROVEMENT
- Site address
- 535 MAINE AVENUE
- City
- FARMINGDALE
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04344
- Mailing
- 170 CHINA ROAD, ALBION, ME 04910
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 B01
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1): The Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites: Construction site - The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters or an assured equipment grounding conductor program to protect employees from the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: Construction site - The grounding pin was removed from the orange extension cord that supplied power to the ESE pan former, and a Milwaukee drill.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Protection was not provided to avoid damage to flexible cords and cables used for temporary wiring which passed through doorways or other pinch points: Construction site - Three extension cords passing through a metal framed doorway were not protected from the pinch point created by the door and a door frame.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: Construction Site - Four people on the roof engaged in roofing activities 6 feet or more above the lower level were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) Front of building, Right Side of Building Entrance - The extension ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the surface of the roof. b) Front of building, Left Side of Building Entrance - The extension ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Sep 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: Back of the Building - A silver extension ladder was used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately the same as the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340867910.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.