LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: BOYLES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BOYLES CONSTRUCTION, INC. in RAHLINGS RD., LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 340870849.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOYLES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- RAHLINGS RD.
- City
- LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72211
- Mailing
- 34101 KANIS ROAD, PARON, AR 72122
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Employees installed drain pipe in a trench adjacent to the roadway approximately 7-8 feet in depth. The employer did not ensure employees wore protective helmets when working in areas where dangers of overhead hazards existed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.200 G02
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(2): Traffic control signs or devices used for protection of construction workers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (AMUTCD"), 1988 Edition, Revision 3, September 3, 1993, FHWA-SA-94-027 or Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millenium Edition, December 2000, FHWA. The employer had not requirements set forth in the Manual on Uniform Control Devices in set-up of a temporary traffic control plan (TTC) when performing work adjacent to traffic.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Employees performed work inside of a trench approximately 7-8 feet in depth with no safe means of egress provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 I03
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(i)(3): Sidewalks, pavements, or appurtenant structures had been undermined and a support system or another method was not provided to protect employees from the possible collapse of such structures: The employer had undermined the pavement of Rahlings road for expansion on a trench opening with no support system or other method used to protect employees from possible collapse of the concrete overhand structure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. The employer had excavated a trench for drain pipe installation and had not provided protection from keeping the excavated material at least two feet from the edge of the excavation, exposing employees to overhead and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions: An inspection of a trench approximately 17 feet long, 5 feet wide, and 7-8 feet deep was not conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.652 B
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(b): The slopes and configurations of sloping and benching systems were not in accordance with the requirement options of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4): The employer had not designed the sloping for a 7-8 feet trench in accordance with 1926.652(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4) as required, exposing employees to overhead and cave-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $28,000 · Current $18,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(b) or 1926.652(c): The employer had not protected employees from cave-in hazards when working in a trench 7-8 feet deep installing drain pipe.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $18000
- — Z (W) $28000
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Oct 14, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30. The employer had failed to post annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses on the OSHA Form 300A or equivalent as required in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Boyles Construction, INC.
View Boyles Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340870849.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.