Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SL POSSIBILITIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SL POSSIBILITIES in 33 BROADWAY, SARANAC LAKE, NY 12983 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 340871144.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SL Possibilities for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SL Possibilities is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SL POSSIBILITIES
Site address
33 BROADWAY
City
SARANAC LAKE
State
NY
ZIP
12983
Mailing
189 FOREST HILL AVENUE, SARANAC LAKE, NY 12983
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.304 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(h)(1): Each circular crosscut table saw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw blade above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 8/20/15:  Workers were using a Makita table saw withouot a guard on the blade.    Abatement certification must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around the hole:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 8/20/15:  Workers were exposed to falling 10 feet to the lower level where a stairway had been removed and the opening remained unprotected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.502 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 8/20/15:  Employees were working in close proximity to and transiting past a guardrail that measured only 32 inches from the walking surface, and had no midrail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.502 B02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2)(i): Midrails, when used, were not installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working level; screens and mesh, when used, did not extend from the top rail to the walking/working level and along the entire opening between top rail supports:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 8/20/15:  Employees were working in close proximity to and transiting past a guardrail that measured only 32 inches from the walking surface, and had no midrail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 8/20/15:  Employees were working in close proximity to and using a stair well that had no guardrails.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340871144.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.