NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI ·
OSHA Inspection: DAVID CARTER
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAVID CARTER in 621 POUND HILL ROAD, NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI 02896 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340877281.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVID CARTER
- Site address
- 621 POUND HILL ROAD
- City
- NORTH SMITHFIELD
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02896
- Mailing
- 5958 ROCK SPRINGS ROAD, GLENCOE, AL 35905
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) Establishment: As of January 6, 2016, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 2, Item 1 from inspection 1087728, issued on 09/17/2015, with a final order date of 10/14/2015.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. (a) Jobsite - Upper Exterior Wall: On or about 8/26/2015, employees were not protected from falling out of a telescoping boom lift while installing exterior siding to a structure greater than twenty feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: (a) Jobsite - Upper Exterior Wall: On or about 8/26/2015, the employer allowed employees to operate a telescoping boom lift without undergoing the necessary training to ensure safe operations.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
More inspections at David Carter
View David Carter's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340877281.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.