OSHA Inspection: S & N SALES

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Dec 10, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):   A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that a written respiratory protection program was maintained in accordance with this subpart when employee(s) were required to wear supplied air respirators when performing sandblasting operations.

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Dec 10, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):   The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:(a)  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that employee(s) who were medically evaluated to determine the employee(s) ability to use the respirator, before being required to use the respirator in sandblasting operations.

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Dec 10, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii):   The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that employee(s) who operator fork lifts had successfully completed the training in accordance with this subpart.

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Nov 18, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):   Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that fork lift(s) were examined prior to being placed in to service.

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Dec 10, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):   Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that  they developed or implemented a written hazard communication program when employees exposed hazardous substances such as but not limited to silica during sandblasting operations.

Issued

Oct 22, 2015

Abate by

Dec 10, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):   Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  At the facility the employer was failing to ensure that employees were trained on hazardous materials that they had not been previously trained about such as but not limited to Silica.