FATE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE E. MARTINEZ
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JOSE E. MARTINEZ in 284 CALLAGHAN DRIVE, FATE, TX 75132 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340906882.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE E. MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 284 CALLAGHAN DRIVE
- City
- FATE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75132
- Mailing
- 314 CHAPARRAL RD., FERRIS, TX 75125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) The employer did not ensure that all three (3) employees working on the roof more than six (6) feet above a lower level were protected from falling to that lower level by the use of guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3080
More inspections at Jose E. Martinez
View Jose E. Martinez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340906882.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.