CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: UNIQUE FURNITURE ENTERPRISES
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UNIQUE FURNITURE ENTERPRISES in 8711 READING ROAD SUITE E3, CINCINNATI, OH 45216 (NAICS 811420). OSHA activity number 340913516.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNIQUE FURNITURE ENTERPRISES
- Site address
- 8711 READING ROAD SUITE E3
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45216
- Mailing
- 8711 READING ROAD SUITE E3, CINCINNATI, OH 45216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811420
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1080173025909010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): On or about September 14, 2015, the employer had not performed a hazard assessment to determine what personal protective equipment would protect employees who worked with chemicals, such as methylene chloride and xylene, while refinishing furniture. (a) Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; (b) Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and, (c) Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1080173025909010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: (a) On or about September 14, 2015, the employer did not certify that a hazard assessment of the workplace had been completed. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1080173025909010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about September 14, 2015, the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program for employees who wore 3M 5000 series tight fitting facepiece respirators when working with chemicals, such as methylene chloride and xylene, while refinishing furniture. (a) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; (b) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; (c) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; (d) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; (e) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; (f) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; (g) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; (h) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and (i) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.107 B02
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
108017302590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2): The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury. (a) The walls of the paint booth contained ridges and the corners contained gaps in the metal siding that did not facilitate the ease of cleaning required by this standard. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
108017302590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauge(s), audible alarm(s) or pressure activated device(s) installed on paint spray booth(s) to indicate or insure that the required air velocity was maintained. (a) The paint booth in the refinishing department did not have any visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices to indicate that the air velocity was maintained at 100 linear feet per minute. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B01 V
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
17302590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(v): Safety of electrical equipment was not determined by considering heating effects under all conditions of use. (a) The employer did not consider the heating effects of the Ingersoll Rand T30 compressor, which was used during operation of the spray paint booth, and was known to overheat, causing a fire hazard. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.334 A01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(1): Portable electric equipment was not handled in a manner which would not cause damage: (a) The employer did not handle a portable fan in an appropriate manner when it was balanced on the wooden frame surrounding the Ingersoll Rand T30 compressor, and was used to cool the compressor motor to prevent a fire hazard. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 D01 I
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i): Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure: (a) The employer did not determine the exposure of the refinishing employee to methylene chloride when that employee was stripping furniture using Besway M-36 Industrial Paint Remover, which contained 70-80% by weight methylene chloride. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
1080173025909010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (a) The employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees who worked with hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to M-36 stripper containing methylene chloride, paints containing xylene, ethyl benzene and formaldehyde, and silica sand used for sand blasting. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1080173025909010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) The employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees who worked with hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to M-36 stripper containing methylene chloride, paints containing xylene, ethyl benzene and formaldehyde, and silica sand used for sand blasting. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811420)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340913516.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.