Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONTINENTAL CONCEPTS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONTINENTAL CONCEPTS, INC. in 576 WASHINGTON STREET, WELLESLEY, MA 02482 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 340918440.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Continental Concepts, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Continental Concepts, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
576 WASHINGTON STREET
City
WELLESLEY
State
MA
ZIP
02482
Mailing
P.O. BOX 120700, BOSTON, MA 02112
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423330
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  Jobsite:  Small and larger pump jack scaffolds on Washington Street.  Employees accessing pump jack scaffolds from the roof had to step down more than 2 feet to reach the scaffold work platforms.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  Jobsite:  small and larger pump jack scaffolds on Washington Street side of building.  Instance A:  A small pump jack scaffold at the northwest corner of the  building lacked a end rail thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard to the ground below of approximately 42 feet.     Instance B:  A larger pump jack scaffold lacked an end rail and mid-rail, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 42 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Jobsite:  Scaffold erectors have not been adequately trained in scaffold safety.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Jobsite:  roof  Employees working on the roof without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately 46 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2016
Abate by
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $700
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  Jobsite:  The employer did not provide the CSHO with OSHA injury and illness logs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340918440.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.