DUNELLEN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: TWINS CARPENTRY, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TWINS CARPENTRY, LLC in 315 MADISON AVENUE, DUNELLEN, NJ 08812 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 340921915.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TWINS CARPENTRY, LLC
- Site address
- 315 MADISON AVENUE
- City
- DUNELLEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08812
- Mailing
- 540 VORHEES AVE, MIDDLESEX, NJ 08846
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238350
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) 1st floor of house- Employee was exposed to a potential head injury while working and walking under employees that were operating pneumatic nail guns while performing framing above; on or about 9/14/15.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1600
- — I (S) $1040
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) Roof level of the house- Employee was exposed to a fall of up to approximately 20 feet while walking across floor joists without the use of fall protection; on or about 09/14/15.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2800
- — I (S) $1820
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238350)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340921915.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.