Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREEN TECH ASSETS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREEN TECH ASSETS, LLC in 30 MEETING ST, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864 (NAICS 562219). OSHA activity number 340924885.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Green Tech Assets, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Green Tech Assets, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30 MEETING ST
City
CUMBERLAND
State
RI
ZIP
02864
Mailing
30 MEETING ST, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562219
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:    a) Workplace: On or about 9-14-15 the employer did not ensure that exit route doors were able to open without the use of keys, tools or special knowledge, specifically:    1. Exit door on west side of the CDK/Backroom   2. Exit door on north side of rear warehouse.  3. Exit door on the west side of the rear warehouse adjacent to the vertical baler.
Recent events (4)
  • — I $7000
  • — Z $9977
  • — I (S) $1680

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  a) Workplace: On or about 9-14-15 the employer did not ensure that exit routes were kept free and unobstructed, specifically:  1. Routes leading to the exit door on north side of rear warehouse,  2.  Routes leading to the exit door on the west side of the rear warehouse adjacent to the vertical baler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    a) Workplace: On or about 9-14-15 the employer did not establish a written emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.157 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): The employer shall assure that portable fire extinguishers are maintained in a fully charged and operable condition and kept in their designated places at all times except during use:  a) Receiving and shipping warehouses:  On or about 9-14-16 the employer had not ensured that portable fire extinguishers were maintained in a fully charged and operable condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  a) Receiving and shipping areas of front warehouse:  On or about 9-14-16 the employer had not completed an annual maintenance check of fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a) Throughout the workplace: On or about 9/14/15 the employer did not conduct a  workplace hazard assessment where employees were routinely exposed to hazards including exposure of the feet to crushing injuries when handling boxes and pallets of recycled electronic office equipment.    Abatement Note:   Once the PPE Hazard Assessment is completed you shall:      1) Certify that the hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132 (d)(2),     2) Provide training to affected employees in proper use of required PPE (1910.132 (f)(1))    Guidance on conducting and documenting a PPE Hazard Assessment can be found on OSHA's website at:     http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/personalprotectiveequipment/
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet were exposed to electrical hazards:  a) Warehouse areas, workstations and client locations:  On or about 9-14-15  the employer did not ensure that employees working with pallets and boxes of recycled electronics were using appropriate protective foot wear.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a) Baler Area of Rear Warehouse:  On or about 9-14-15 the employer had not ensured that the gate interlock was operational when the Selco Products Inc. V5 HD LR vertical baler was in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    a) Workplace: On or about 9-14-15 the employer had not ensured that electrical equipment was being used in accordance with instructions included on the equipment listing, specifically:    a. Front Warehouse:   Power strips were used to power other power strips at various work stations.  b. Front Warehouse: Electrical extension cords were powering various power strips.  c. Backroom/CDK Area :  Electrical extension cords were providing power to power strips.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    a) Throughout the warehouse areas: The employer had not ensured that electrical panels had sufficient access and working space provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    a) Receiving Warehouse:  On or about 9/14/15, the electrical cord for a floor fan had been spliced to another cord leaving exposed covered and bare conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.22 B01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Aisles and passageways were not kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard:    a) Warehouse Areas: On or about 9-14-15 the employer had not kept the passage ways clear and in good repair as noted by the following conditions observed:    1. Warehouse floors were not maintained in good repair,  2. The warehouse employee bathroom floor was not maintained free of standing water,  3. Walkway floors had extension cords crossing on them.    Green Tech Assets, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard which was contained in OSHA inspection number 838363, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/26/13, with respect to a workplace located at 30 Meeting St Cumberland, RI 02864.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $1440
  • — Z (R) $2400

1910.141 A03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed:  a) Employee Restroom  in Warehouse:  On or about 9-14-15 the employer did not maintain the employee restroom in a sanitary manner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.141 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2016
Abate by
Apr 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): A continuing and effective extermination program was not instituted where rodents, insects, or other vermin were detected:  a) Break room kitchen: On or about 9-14-15 the employer did not maintain an effective rodent extermination program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Green Tech Assets, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340924885.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.