Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FAUSTO MENDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAUSTO MENDEZ in 3209 ROUGH CREEK DRIVE, GARLAND, TX 75040 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340925163.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fausto Mendez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fausto Mendez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FAUSTO MENDEZ
Site address
3209 ROUGH CREEK DRIVE
City
GARLAND
State
TX
ZIP
75040
Mailing
4404 HIGHLAND STREET, LANCASTER, TX 75134
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:  On the south side of the home where employees performing roofing work were not protected from fall hazards of more than 19-feet to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On the east side of the home where employees were using an extendable aluminum ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:  On the south side of the home where employees were using an extendable aluminum ladder to access the roof and the ladder was not placed on a level surface nor was it secured to prevent accidental displacement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340925163.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.