GARLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FAUSTO MENDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAUSTO MENDEZ in 3209 ROUGH CREEK DRIVE, GARLAND, TX 75040 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340925163.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAUSTO MENDEZ
- Site address
- 3209 ROUGH CREEK DRIVE
- City
- GARLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75040
- Mailing
- 4404 HIGHLAND STREET, LANCASTER, TX 75134
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On the south side of the home where employees performing roofing work were not protected from fall hazards of more than 19-feet to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On the east side of the home where employees were using an extendable aluminum ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level: On the south side of the home where employees were using an extendable aluminum ladder to access the roof and the ladder was not placed on a level surface nor was it secured to prevent accidental displacement.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340925163.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.