HAMPTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: ROGELIO PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROGELIO PEREZ in 20 N STREET, HAMPTON, NH 03842 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340929017.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROGELIO PEREZ
- Site address
- 20 N STREET
- City
- HAMPTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03842
- Mailing
- 708 BROADWAY, EVERETT, MA 02149
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by, crushing, and caught between hazards associated with the installation of prefabricated parallel chord trusses without any temporary bracing: a. Level 2- Employees working beneath prefabricated parallel chord floor trusses were exposed to struck by, crushing, and caught between hazards where the trusses were not braced during installation, construction loads were applied to the trusses, and employees were working from the top chord of the trusses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards and using personal fall arrest equipment were not provide with training on the proper installation, use, and limitations of their personal fall arrest equipment by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): a. Site- Employees operating a JLG 1044C-54 all terrain forklift were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: a. Site- Employees using a 10 foot Werner step ladder to access the third floor from the second floor were exposed to a fall hazard where the top of the step ladder did not reach the landing surface. Employees used the top step and top of the ladder to access the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $28,000 · Current $14,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Third Floor- Employees framing and sheathing the third floor were exposed to a fall of approximately 10 feet to the second floor and 25 feet to the exterior grade where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $14000
- — Z (W) $28000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $22,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. Site- Employees operating Hitachi pneumatic nail guns and Makita circular power saws were not protected from eye injuries where the employer failed to provided eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $0
- — Z (W) $22000
More inspections at Rogelio Perez
View Rogelio Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340929017.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.