Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: C & C MACHINE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of C & C MACHINE, INC. in 159 BUCHNER PLACE, LA CROSSE, WI 54603 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340932425.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch C & C Machine, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for C & C Machine, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
C & C MACHINE, INC.
Site address
159 BUCHNER PLACE
City
LA CROSSE
State
WI
ZIP
54603
Mailing
159 BUCHNER PLACE, LA CROSSE, WI 54603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 13 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Apr 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators from the hazard created by the following:    a) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Nardini - IN20160 T lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    b) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Victor (model number illegible) lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    c) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Monarch (serial number 32334) lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    d) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Clausing - Colohester 17" lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    e) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Willis were not guarded to protect the operators.    f) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Summit lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    g) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Clausing - Colochester 21" lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    h) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Howa 1500 lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    i) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Clausing - Colochester 15" lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    j) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Nardini - IN25160 T lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    k) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Clausing - Colohester 17" lathe (with a left handed apron - used for thermal spraying) were not guarded to protect the operators.    l)  The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Mazak Quick Turn 25 lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    m) The rotating jaws of the chuck on the Mazak Quick Turn 25-L lathe were not guarded to protect the operators.    n) The point of operation on the Mazak Mazatech V655B vertical machine center was not guarded to protect the operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $952
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Apr 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    The employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program that contained the elements necessary to ensure that employees voluntarily wearing a supplied air respirator were medically able to do so, and that the air supply was monitored to ensure it had Grade D breathing air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1190
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Apr 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees using supplied air respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both:  The employer did not have a carbon monoxide alarm present on the oil lubricated compressor used to supply breathing air to the employees using a supplied air respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    The employer uses 110 p.s.i. compressed air for cleaning chips away while machining parts without the outlet or source fitted with a relief device that drops the pressure to less than 30 P.S.I. if the flow is dead ended.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  The employer did not provide employees voluntarily wearing a supplied air respirator with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View C & C Machine, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340932425.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.