LA BELLE, MO —
OSHA Inspection: SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC. in 14014 255TH STREET, LA BELLE, MO 63447 (NAICS 115116). OSHA activity number 340951912.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.
- Site address
- 14014 255TH STREET
- City
- LA BELLE
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63447
- Mailing
- 6417 SHELBY 150, SUITE A, BETHEL, MO 63434
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 115116
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an ejection hazard during vehicle operation: The rear door latch on 1995 Ford Aerostar cargo van was inoperable. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this apparent hazardous condition is to maintain the rear door latch according to vehicle manufacturer's requirements. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to electric shock hazards: At the time of the inspection the following electrical hazards were found exposing employees to a shock and or an electrocution hazard; a) The electrical box in the goat dairy electrical room had several openings that were not covered, exposing employees accessing the panel box to live 240 volt electrical. b) The ground sensors in the 20 stall hallway were missing light bulbs and globes, exposing employees in the area to live 110 volt electrical. c) The electrical switch on the south wall of the cow dairy compressor room had live wires with wire nuts, exposing employees in the area to live 110 volt electrical. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this apparent hazardous condition is to install electrical components in compliance with NFPA 70: National Electric Code. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard during vehicle operation: a) On and prior to 09-26-2015, employees in a moving vehicle were exposed to struck-by hazards in that the employer modified the 1995 Ford Aerostar cargo van, VIN 1FTDA14U4SZA87305 by the placement of two bench seats in the van to accommodate passengers. The bench seats were not secured to the vehicle. b) On and prior to 09-26-2015, employees in a moving vehicle were exposed to struck-by hazards in that the employer modified the 1995 Ford Aerostar cargo van, VIN 1FTDA14U4SZA87305 by the placement of two bench seats within the van to accommodate passengers. The seats did not have adequate seat belts available for employee use. The seat belts were not secured to the vehicle, nor was there a sufficient number of seatbelts available for the passengers using the van. The vehicle was equipped with one complete seat belt for the rear facing bench seat. Additionally use of seat belts by passengers was not enforced. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this apparent hazardous condition is to install passenger seats and restraint devices according to vehicle manufacturer's requirements. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheels used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guards which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: At the time of the inspection, the following abrasive wheel grinders were used without the spindle guards: a) The Delta ShopMaster pedestal grinder in the Heartland Machine shop. b) The Craftsman Professional bench grinder in the Heartland Machine shop.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: At the time of the inspection the following grinders were operated without tool rests; a) The Delta ShopMaster pedestal grinder in the Heartland Machine shop. b) The Craftsman Professional bench grinder in the Heartland Machine shop. c) The Power Bench grinder in the Heartland Welding shop. d) The Baldor Pedestal grinder in the Heartland Welding shop.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: At the time of the inspection, the following abrasive wheel grinders were not equipped with a tongue guard; a) The Delta ShopMaster pedestal grinder in the Heartland Machine shop. b) The Craftsman Professional bench grinder in the Heartland Machine shop. c) The Power Bench grinder in the Heartland Welding shop. d) The Baldor Pedestal grinder in the Heartland Welding shop.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1928.57 B01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(b)(1)(i): All power take-off shafts, including rear, mid- or side-mounted shafts, shall be guarded either by a master shield, as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or by other protective guarding. At the time of the inspection, the following equipment was operated with a defective power take-off guard; a) The hay grinder and tractor in the feed floor area. b) The Kinze Model AW grain wagon and tractor on the Bud Moore farm. c) The Kinze 1040 Row Crop grain wagon and tractor on the Bud Moore farm. d) The Bush Hog Model 2815 mower parked near the feed floor on the cow dairy.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1928.57 B04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(b)(4)(i): Guards, shields, and access doors shall be in place when the equipment is in operation. At the time of the inspection, the Mueller compressor in the 60 stall cow dairy mechanical room was operated with the fan guard housing removed exposing employees to the rotating fan blades and a caught-in hazard. Maintenance employees were exposed to the fan during an unexpected start-up of the unit.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $5000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
More inspections at SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.
LA BELLE, MO—2018-03-13 00:00:00
SHARPE HOLDINGS INC.
BETHEL, MO—2015-10-20 00:00:00
SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.
LA BELLE, MO—2015-01-15 00:00:00
SHARPE HOLDINGS INC.
LA BELLE, MO—2014-09-03 00:00:00
SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.
LA BELLE, MO—2014-05-29 00:00:00
SHARPE HOLDINGS INC.
View SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 115116)
ZILLAH, WA—2026-07-08
WA317991988 - AG MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
RUTHERFORD, CA—2026-06-18
COLINAS FARMING COMPANY
PASCO, WA—2026-06-15
WA317991671 - DOUGLAS AG SERVICES INC
ZILLAH, WA—2026-05-20
WA317991334 - AG MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
WESTMORLAND, CA—2026-05-20
ROYAL OAK AG SERVICES, INC.
More inspections in MO
KANSAS CITY, MO—2026-07-09
NIAGARA BOTTLING
MONETT, MO—2026-07-09
MONETT METALS INC.
PARKVILLE, MO—2026-07-08
SKY-TECH ROOFING, LLC.
SPRINGFIELD, MO—2026-07-07
D & C CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
JOPLIN, MO—2026-07-07
SERVICE RECYCLING - NORTH PLANT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340951912.