1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC. in 6417 SHELBY 150, SUITE A, BETHEL, MO 63434 (NAICS 115116). OSHA activity number 341086247.

Watch Sharpe Holdings, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sharpe Holdings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6417 SHELBY 150, SUITE A
City
BETHEL
State
MO
ZIP
63434
Mailing
6417 SHELBY 150, SUITE A, BETHEL, MO 63434
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
115116
Employees
300
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2470S900

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     a. At the time of the inspection, employee in the Heartland Auto & Body Shop was required to wear an SAS 1/2 mask, organic cartridge respirator and the employer had not developed a written respirator program to cover the following sections;    b. At the time of the inspection, employee at the Sharpe Land & Cattle Concrete plant was required to wear a single use, disposable respirator and the employer had not developed a written respirator program to cover the following sections;    1910.134(c)(1)(i)-Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace;  (ii)-Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators;  (iii)-Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators;  (iv)-Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations;  (v)-Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators;  (vii)-Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations;  (viii)-Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and  (ix)-Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. At the time of the inspection, employee in the Heartland Auto & Body Shop was required to wear an SAS 1/2 mask, organic cartridge respirator was not provided a medical evaluation before use of the respirator.  b. At the time of the inspection, employee at the Sharpe Land & Cattle Concrete plant was required to wear a single use, disposable respirator was not provided a medical evaluation before use of the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter:  a. At the time of the inspection, an employee in the Heartland Auto & Body Shop who was required to wear an SAS 1/2 mask, organic cartridge respirator was not fit tested before use of the respirator.  b. At the time of the inspection, an employee at the Sharpe Land & Cattle Concrete plant who was required to wear a single use, disposable respirator was not fit tested before use of the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.    Confined spaces were not adequately ass prior to entry exposing employees to all potential hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(2): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not identify and evaluate the hazards of permit spaces before employees entered:  At the time of the inspection, the employer had not identified and evaluated the hazards of the concrete mixer permit required confined space prior to entry to include, but not limited to, drum rotation and falling materials. An employee entered the concrete mixer at the batch plant to jackhammer solidified concrete from the sides of the mixer.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 D03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations:  At the time of the inspection, an employee entered and conducted work inside a concrete truck mixer at the batch plant prior to the development and implementation of safe work practices.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D04 VIII

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4)(viii): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not ensure that employees properly used rescue and emergency equipment needed to comply with 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9):  At the time of the inspection, it was determined that employees entered permit-required confined space concrete truck mixers at the batch plant without emergency rescue equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 D09

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): The employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and/or for preventing unauthorized entry.  At the time of the inspection, the employer had not implemented rescue and emergency procedures for employees who accessed permit-required confined spaces such as the concrete mixer drums.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 D06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(6): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit space into which entry was authorized for the duration of entry operations:  At the time of the inspection, it was determined that entry had been made into permit-required confined spaces without an attendant present.  On 8-24-15 an employee entered a concrete truck mixer drum at the batch plant to remove concrete with a jackhammer.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(h)(1): The employer did not ensure that all authorized entrants knew the hazards that could be faced during entry, including information on the mode, sign or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure:  At the time of the inspection, it was determined that employees that entered the permit-required confined space concrete truck mixer drums had not been trained on the hazards of rotation of the drum, requirement to have an attendant, and the need to wear retrieval harness.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.146 J01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(1): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor knew the hazards that could be faced during entry, including information on the mode, signs or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure:  At the time of the inspection, the entry supervisor for the employee entering the permit-required concrete truck mixer drum was not made aware of the hazards including, but not limited to, struck-by hazard created by not securing the drum from rotating and falling debris.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.151 C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use;     At the time of the inspection, production employees in the Heartland Creamery were exposed to corrosive cleaners such as "Solodigm", "Vortexx, "AC-103 and "XY-12" when sanitizing and no eye wash facilities were readily available.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.169 B03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.169(b)(3)(iv): Safety valve(s) on compressed air receiver(s) were not tested at frequently regular intervals to determine if they were in good operating condition:    At the time of the inspection, the following air receivers were in service and had not had the safety relief valves tested;    a) In the Creamery, the Quincy compressor and Manchester receiver #1232720.  b) In the Concrete plant, the 120 gallon air receiver and second air tank.  c) In the Land & Cattle Auto Shop, the air compressor receiver.   d) In the Cleansing Waters Laundry, the air compressor receiver.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7000.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:    At the time of the inspection, the following equipment was operated with a cord and plug without a grounding pin:    1. In the Heartland Auto & Body Shop, an 6 inch bench grinder was used monthly to grind metal parts.  2. In the Heartland Auto & Body Shop, a Schumacher Model SE-2352 battery charger was used approximately monthly.  3. In the Heartland Auto & Body Shop, an extension cord was used monthly with a bench grinder.  4. In the Heartland Welding & Machine Shop, a Baldor pedestal grinder was used approximately bi-monthly to grind parts.  5. In the Heartland Welding & Machine Shop, a Schumacher Model SE-3612 battery charger was used approximately quarterly.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $70000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section;  At the time of the inspection, the following instances of employee exposure to hazardous energy were found;  a) Heartland Creamery: the employer did not develop control procedures regarding the maintenance and repair of the creamery boiler.  Employees were exposed to multiple energy sources, to include but not limited to, electrical, thermal, and natural gas when the maintained and repaired the boiler.  b) One employee in the Sharpe Land & Cattle Concrete plant was exposed to hazardous energy such as rotating parts, caught in and struck by hazards when working inside concrete mixer trucks.   The Sharpe Holdings Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.147(c)(4)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number #955729 , citation number 1, item number 2a and was affirmed as a final order on 2/15/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 14014 255th St., LaBelle, MO 63447.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $0
  • — C (R) $70000
  • — Z (R) $70000

View SHARPE HOLDINGS, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341086247.