NORTH CANTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: R J MAC INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of R J MAC INC in 1280 S MAIN ST, NORTH CANTON, OH 44720 (NAICS 448120). OSHA activity number 340957307.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R J MAC INC
- Site address
- 1280 S MAIN ST
- City
- NORTH CANTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44720
- Mailing
- 1280 S MAIN ST, NORTH CANTON, OH 44720
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 448120
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1048 D02 III
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- May 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $250 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2)(iii): The employer received reports of signs or symptoms of respiratory or dermal conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure and the employer did not promptly monitor the affected employee's exposure: On or about August 18, 2015 the employer received a report that an employee was experiencing conditions related to formaldehyde exposure and no air sampling was scheduled to determine exposure to employees who work on the site.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $250
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1048 L01 II
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who develop signs and symptoms of overexposure to formaldehyde : On or about August 18, 2015 the employer received a report that an employee was experiencing conditions related to formaldehyde exposure and no medical surveillance was provided.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 L08 VI
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(l)(8)(vi): The employer did not maintain the employee's current earnings, seniority, and other benefits when the employee had been removed pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.1048(l)(8)(v): On or about August 18, 2015 the employer received a report that an employee was experiencing conditions related to formaldehyde exposure; the employee did not work from at least that date until the day of the inspection on 10/13/15 and the employees earnings were not maintained.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 M03 I
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that hazard warning labels complying with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) were affixed to all containers of materials listed in 29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(i), except to the extent that 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) is inconsistent with 29 CFR 1910.1048(m): Warning labels were not provided for clothing bags containing clothing which was capable of releasing formaldehyde.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- May 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: On 10/13/15, a presser employee was exposed to formaldehyde at 0.16 parts per million (PPM) and a seamstress was exposed to 0.20 PPM this exceeds the threshold of 0.10 PPM, which requires that employees participate in a training program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- May 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $250 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: No written program was developed for employees who were exposed to formaldehyde and who use shoe dye which contains the hazardous chemicals Isopropanol and 2-Butyoxyethanol.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $250
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- May 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Warning labels were not provided for clothing bags containing clothing which was capable of releasing formaldehyde.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2015
- Abate by
- May 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) Safety data sheets were not maintained on the site for clothing which was capable of releasing formaldehyde and for shoe dye which contains the hazardous chemicals Isopropanol and 2-Butoxyethanol.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 448120)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340957307.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.