Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO, LLC in 12805 U.S. HWY 98 E BLDG. I, INLET BEACH, FL 32413 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340962679.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Benitez and Friend'S Stucco, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Benitez and Friend'S Stucco, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12805 U.S. HWY 98 E BLDG. I
City
INLET BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32413
Mailing
820 GIBSON RD. LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 V

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway:    a.  On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee installing stucco to the facing of the building was using a scaffold that did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard.    b. On or about October 5, 2015 on the northwest side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a scaffold to load a forklift did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2440
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access:  a.  On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold,  exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard.  b.  On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, two employees working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold,  exposing the employees to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:    a.  On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial building, employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use toeboards on the edges,  exposing the employee to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a.   On the northwest side of the structure, an employee applying stucco material to the gable of a commercial building was not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2440
  • — Z (S) $4900

View Benitez and Friend'S Stucco, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340962679.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.