INLET BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO, LLC in 12805 U.S. HWY 98 E BLDG. I, INLET BEACH, FL 32413 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340962679.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENITEZ AND FRIEND'S STUCCO, LLC
- Site address
- 12805 U.S. HWY 98 E BLDG. I
- City
- INLET BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32413
- Mailing
- 820 GIBSON RD. LOT 43, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 V
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee installing stucco to the facing of the building was using a scaffold that did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard. b. On or about October 5, 2015 on the northwest side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a scaffold to load a forklift did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2440
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, an employee working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold, exposing the employee to a 25 feet fall hazard. b. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial structure, two employees working on a frame scaffold did not use a ladder to exit and access the scaffold, exposing the employees to a 13 feet 4 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about October 5, 2015 on the north side of a new commercial building, employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use toeboards on the edges, exposing the employee to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On the northwest side of the structure, an employee applying stucco material to the gable of a commercial building was not protected from a 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2440
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Benitez and Friend'S Stucco, LLC
View Benitez and Friend'S Stucco, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340962679.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.