OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL FLORIDA MOBILE WASH, INC

Issued

Nov 25, 2015

Abate by

Dec 8, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) In the warehouse area and during field work, the employer provided eye glasses for protection against corrosive liquids instead of goggles. The violation was discovered on or about October 6, 2015.

Issued

Nov 25, 2015

Abate by

Dec 22, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) In the warehouse area near the bay doors, employees were exposed to chemical burns and eye injuries when employees used corrosive chemicals NuBrite Aluminum Brightener Pro Plus, but were not provided with a suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body. This violation was discovered on or about October 6, 2015.

Issued

Nov 25, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(x): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from accidental damage, as might be caused, for example, by sharp corners, projections, and doorways or other pinch points:  a) In the warehouse near the bay doors, employees are exposed to electrical hazards when a flexible cord was damaged and missing a ground prong, that was powering equipment the previous day, was laying on the floor and plugged in. This violation was observed on or about October 6, 2015.