ROCK ISLAND, IL —
OSHA Inspection: RICK BRUMMELL
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of RICK BRUMMELL in 4300 11TH ST, ROCK ISLAND, IL 61201 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340968379.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICK BRUMMELL
- Site address
- 4300 11TH ST
- City
- ROCK ISLAND
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61201
- Mailing
- 321 GAP ST, LOUISIANA, MO 63353
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: An employee was exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof eave. The employee was working approximately 8.8 feet above the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1060 A01 III
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders: An employee was exposed to fall hazards because the extension ladder did not extend three feet above the roof and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: An employee was exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities by covering the skylights because of the lack of fall protection. The employee was exposed to an exterior fall distance of approximately 8.8 feet and an interior fall distance of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: An employee was exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities by covering skylights because of the lack of fall protection and the employer did not have a training program for providing fall protection of the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: An employee was exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not have a safety and health program that addresses areas such as, but not limited to, fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: An employee was exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340968379.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.