Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SWARTFAGER WELDING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SWARTFAGER WELDING, INC. in 199 BOYLE MEMORIAL DRIVE, KNOX, PA 16232 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 340969450.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Swartfager Welding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Swartfager Welding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
199 BOYLE MEMORIAL DRIVE
City
KNOX
State
PA
ZIP
16232
Mailing
199 BOYLE MEMORIAL DRIVE, KNOX, PA 16232
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2015
Abate by
Dec 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crush injuries, caught between, and struck by hazards from industrial trucks not being equipped with operator restraint devices.      A.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc. - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, an employees were operating a Yale industrial fork truck (serial #276706)  and were not wearing a seatbelt or restraint device.  The Yale forklift was not equipped with a seat belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2015
Abate by
Dec 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $2,700
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   A.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc., - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, to the company had not performed annual periodic inspections with authorized employees.  The employees performed servicing and maintenance on equipment that included, but was not limited to, forklifts, lathes, cranes, and welders.  Servicing and maintenance included, but was not limited to, preventative maintenance and repairs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2015
Abate by
Dec 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):      A.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc. - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, employees were operating  fork trucks, that included, but were not limited to, Yale industrial fork truck (serial #276706).  Employees had not received forklift training on workplace related topics, in accordance with 1910.178 (l)(3)(ii) (A)-(I).      B.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc. - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, employees were operating fork trucks, that included, but were not limited to, Yale industrial fork truck (serial #276706).  Employees had not been reevaluated by the employer every three years or after a near miss or an accident.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2015
Abate by
Dec 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:      A.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc., lathe department; Trak TRL 2460X - On or about 10/6/15, a cap that covered a rotating spindle was not guarded.  The cap rotated and was installed to cover the rotating spindle.  The cap protruded 2 1/2 inches beyond the machinery.    B.)  Swartfager Wlelding, Inc., lathe department; Trak TRL 2460X - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, the rotating stock of the lathe protruded up to 6 inches from the side of the machine toward the walkway.  A guard was not erected to protect employees from the rotating stock that protrudes outside of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2015
Abate by
Dec 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one 1/2 hour:      A.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc.,/Bay Door Area: - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, a full oxygen tank and acetylene cylinders were stored together.  The two sets of cylinders were separated by a 1/4 in plate of metal.  The metal plate did not meet the fire resistance requirements.    B.)  Swartfager Welding, Inc.,/Bay Door Area: - On or about 10/6/15, and at times prior thereto, oxygen tanks and acetylene tanks were stored together with no barrier in between them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $3600

View Swartfager Welding, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340969450.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.