Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FROST LIGHTING INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FROST LIGHTING INC. in 5701 37TH AVE., WOODSIDE, NY 11377 (NAICS 337212). OSHA activity number 340971985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frost Lighting INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frost Lighting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FROST LIGHTING INC.
Site address
5701 37TH AVE.
City
WOODSIDE
State
NY
ZIP
11377
Mailing
PO BOX 489 FDR STATION, NEW YORK, NY 10150
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337212
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    (a) Front of Shop - The emergency exit did not have an exit sign; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:    (a) In the workshop - A Powermatic ten inch circular saw used to cut wood was not guarded; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:     (a) In the workshop - A Powermatic ten inch circular saw used to cut wood was not guarded; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 5 instances 65 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent:    (a)    In the workplace - For the years 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $420
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a)  In the shop - A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators to sand wood; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a)  In the shop - Medical evaluations were not provided for employees required to wear 3M half mask respirators to sand wood; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT  (a)  In the shop - The employer did not fit test employees required to wear 3M half mask respirators to sand wood; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  (a)  In the shop - A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators to sand wood; on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for chemicals such as but not limited to latex paints, Krylon spray paints, Minwax stains and lacquer thinner;  on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain safety data sheets for chemicals such as but not limited to latex paints, Krylon spray paints, Minwax stains and lacquer thinner;  on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2015
Abate by
Jan 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in the workplace.   (a) At the worksite - Employee who used hazardous chemicals such, as but not limited to latex paints, Krylon spray paints, Minwax stains and lacquer thinner were not provided information and training;  on or about 10/06/15.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340971985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.