Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AES CLEAN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AES CLEAN TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 3465 MARTIN FARM ROAD, SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 340973833.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AES Clean Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AES Clean Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3465 MARTIN FARM ROAD
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
3465 MARTIN FARM ROAD, SUWANEE, GA 30024
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
67
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Storage cabinet(s) for flammable liquids were not designed or constructed to meet minimal fire resistance as required:  On or about October 8, 2015, employees were exposed to fire hazards when the 55 gallon drums of MEK, N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone, and alcohol were not stored in fire resistant cabinets.  The drums were stored in plastic ENPAC brand roll-top drum storage cabinets.  MEK and alcohol are category 2 flammables.  N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone is a category 4 flammable.  In addition to the three drums of flammables, there is a drum used to collect waste alcohol and a drum used to collect waste N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone that were stored on pallets.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.106 E02 II B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii)(b)(2): More than 120 gallons of Category 2, 3, or 4 flammable or combustible liquids in containers were located outside of inside storage room(s) or storage cabinet(s):  On or about October 8, 2015, employees were exposed to fire hazards when the 55 gallon drums of MEK, N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone, and alcohol were not stored in fire resistant cabinets.  The potential maximum number of gallons of flammable liquids was 55 gallons of MEK + 55 gallons of N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone + 55 gallons of alcohol = 165 gallons.  MEK and alcohol are category 2 flammables.  N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone is a category 4 flammable.  In addition to the three drums of flammables, there is a drum used to collect waste alcohol and a drum used to collect waste N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  On or about October 5, 2015, employees used materials such as, but not limited to, propane, MEK, N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone, and alcohol.    a.  There was no SDS for propane.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,350
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about October 5, 2015, employees used materials such as, but not limited to, propane, MEK, N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone, and alcohol.      a.  employees were not sure what an SDS/MSDS was.  They had been told during orientation but had not looked at them and just knew that the documents provided information about chemicals and knew that they were shipped with chemicals  b.  Employees using MEK did not know that it was hazardous and needed to be grounded and did not know to wash hands before eating or drinking.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:  On or about October 8, 2015, the employer did not record temporary employee injuries on the OSHA 300 log for 2015:  a. 04/30/2015    On Time Staffing, LLC reported to OSHA that an employee received a recordable injury when he injured his wrist but there was no record of this injury on the employer's log.  According to OTS, the employee received prescription medication. b. 05/06/2015    On Time Staffing, LLC reported to OSHA that an employee received a recordable injury when he injured his finger but there was no record of this injury on the employer's log.  According to OTS, the employee received prescription medication, suture, and light duty.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $450
  • — Z (O) $900

1904.29 B02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Nov 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness.  On or about October 8, 2015, the employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 for temporary employee injuries for 2015:  a. 04/30/2015    On Time Staffing, LLC reported to OSHA that an employee received a recordable injury when he injured his wrist but there was no OSHA form 301 for this injury.  According to OTS, the employee received prescription medication. b. 05/06/2015    On Time Staffing, LLC reported to OSHA that an employee received a recordable injury when he injured his finger but there was no OSHA form 301 for this injury.  According to OTS, the employee received prescription medication, suture, and light duty.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $450
  • — Z (O) $900

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2015
Abate by
Dec 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  On or about October 8, 2015, employees were exposed to hazards when the machine specific procedures written in 2010 had not been inspected.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View AES Clean Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340973833.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.