Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: THE ACME CO.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE ACME CO. in 11600 MAHONING AVE., NORTH JACKSON, OH 44451 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 340982289.

Watch THE Acme CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for THE Acme CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
THE ACME CO.
Site address
11600 MAHONING AVE.
City
NORTH JACKSON
State
OH
ZIP
44451
Mailing
9495 HARVARD BLVD., YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44514
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2275.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not provide guardrails in a storage area that was at a height of approximately 8.6 feet above the lowest level located in the mechanic bay area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2275.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):  The employer did not establish an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occurr and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated, and rendered inoperative:    On or about November 11, 2015, the company did not establish a program to protect employees involved with servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment from the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy.  Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, and hydraulic.  The company maintains and services equipment such as, but not limited to, the plant crusher.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2275
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1365.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not have ABC fire extinguishers located throughout the mechanics bay  visually inspected monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1365
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not provide annual training for portable fire extinguishers when available for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1820.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer had not trained or evaluated employees who drive powered industrial trucks on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1820
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1820.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition.    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not remove from service the Clark Forklift that did not have an operable warning device and had bald tires.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1820
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1365.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area;    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not provide training to new employees on the hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, silica and propane at the time of their initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1365
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details of the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harminization System(GHS).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): In every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial, or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked in a conspicuous place in each space to which they related:  On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not load rate the overhead storage area in the mechanics bay above the bathrooms and office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:      On or about October 9, 2015, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    On or about October 9, 2015, the employer did not provide employees with Appendix D of the respiratory standard when voluntarily using N-95 filtering face piece respirators while working around the plant crusher.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340982289.